Journal: Molecular Medicine Reports
Article Title: Elevated IgG levels induce an M2-to-M1 phenotypic shift in mucosal macrophages and restrict the growth of invasive sphenoid sinus pituitary adenomas
doi: 10.3892/mmr.2026.13878
Figure Lengend Snippet: Spatial heterogeneity of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Immunophenotypic profiling across invasion states: Non-invaded pseudocapsule (n=9; pathologically tumor-free), tumor-invaded pseudocapsule (n=23), control dura mater from non-invasive tumor cases (n=10), tumor-invaded dura mater (n=21), tumor-invaded mucosa (n=10) and non-invaded mucosa (n=53). (A) Representative immunohistochemistry images for the detection of macrophages (IBA-1 + ), CD4 + T cells, CD8 + T cells and CD19 + B cells. Arrows indicate CD19-positive cells. (B) Quantification of macrophage burden (IBA-1 + immunoreactive area; %). (C) Quantification of CD4 + T-cell density (cells per HPF). (D) Quantification of CD8 + T-cell density (cells per HPF). (E-J) Spatial heterogeneity of macrophage phenotypes. (E) Multiplex immunofluorescence images showing IBA-1 + (red), HLA-DR + (green; M1-like) and CD206 + (magenta; M2-like) macrophage distributions at the IF of the pseudocapsule, dura mater and mucosa, and in non-invaded mucosa. (F) Grayscale-intensity distributions for IBA-1 quantified using ImageJ. (G) M1 immunoreactive area (% of microscopic field) in each group (TIM, TIM-IF, TIDM, TIDM-IF, TIP and TIP-IF). (H) M2 immunoreactive area (% of microscopic field) in each group (TIM, TIM-IF, TIDM, TIDM-IF, TIP and TIP-IF). (I) M1 immunoreactive area (% of microscopic field) in the TIM and NIM groups. (J) M2 immunoreactive area (% of microscopic field) in the TIM and NIM groups. (B-D) Kruskal-Wallis test with prespecified Dunn's post hoc planned comparisons (NIM vs. TIM/NIP/TIP/NIDM/TIDM) and Bonferroni correction. (G and H) Unpaired comparisons among TIM, TIDM and TIP, and separately among TIM-IF, TIDM-IF and TIP-IF, were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's multiple-comparisons test, whereas paired comparisons between each tumor region and its matched IF region were performed using the two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Bonferroni correction was applied across all nine comparisons performed in this analysis. (I and J) Unpaired comparisons were analyzed using a two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001. HPF, high-power field; IBA-1, ionised calcium binding adaptor molecule 1; IF, invasive front; NIDM, non-invaded dura mater; NIM, non-invaded mucosa; NIP, non-invaded pseudocapsule; ns, not significant; TIDM, tumor-invaded dura mater; TIM, tumor-invaded mucosa; TIP, tumor-invaded pseudocapsule.
Article Snippet: RAW264.7 macrophages in the M0, M1 or M2 state were treated with IgG (10 μg/ml; cat. no. 14-4714-85; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) or anti-CD47 monoclonal antibody (mAb) (10 μg/ml; cat. no. 16-0479-85; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 37°C for 12 h. For polarization, M1 macrophages were induced with lipopolysaccharide (100 ng/ml; cat. no. HY-D1056; MedChemExpress) plus IFN-γ (20 ng/ml; cat. no. RP01070; ABclonal Biotech Co., Ltd.) for 24 h at 37°C, whereas M2 macrophages were induced with IL-4 (20 ng/ml; cat. no. RP01161; ABclonal Biotech Co., Ltd.) for 24 h at 37°C.
Techniques: Control, Immunohistochemistry, Multiplex Assay, Immunofluorescence, Two Tailed Test, MANN-WHITNEY, Binding Assay